Caution! The site can't guarantee, that text has age permission. The site is not recommended, if you are less than 18 years old.
The site shows example sentences for English words. How the word or phrase could be used in a sentence?
" ... "Activist by ruminations has not, and undoubtedly never will be contrived, pusillanimous, and ensconced..." ... "
" ... I see this aspect of the committee's legislative role as shameful--sorry, but strong words are required for such pusillanimous behavior. ... "
" ... Jesus; they should be up in arms about the way Pandit took Citi to the cleaners over the past 5 years; first selling his hedge fund for $800 million,(profit returns of 3% ) from which he personally coined $165 million. Then, on top of the several hundred million in trading losses that had to be written off, Citi's pusillanimous board of directors rewarded Pandit by making him Citi CEO and awarding him a "Signing Bonus" of $36.7 million. Imagine-- a "signing Bonus" of $36.7 million to a top Citi employee, just for sticking around and taking over. This must be one of the most outrageous cases of failing upwards in corporate history. No doubt it is an abuse of the private enterprise system, which should be Document One in the People VS. Corporate Greed. Whomever approved of it should be tarred and feathered in front of the Federal Reserve building in downtown Wall St. ... "
" ... Last week I commented that the Japanese public--and particularly its food producers in Fukushima prefecture and elsewhere--are being ill-served by pusillanimous bureaucrats and politicians who are terrified of ever being accused of failing to warn of radiation contamination or to protect the public from even the most remote and unsubstantiated alleged health risks. The example is the new 100 becquerel level of cesium pollution (against the previous 500 becquerel temporary standard) per kilogram of rice. I should have mentioned that the U.S. standard for “intervention” is 1200 becquerels. But to know Japan is to know that its bureaucracy seems to think nothing of setting standards far stricter than anywhere else in the world without regard to the scientific evidence on the grounds that there still might “possibly” be a risk. It is a variation on the zero-defect, perfectionist mentality: so long as it cannot be proven not to cause harm, it is presumed to do so. ... "
" ... While a post of this length cannot go into detail, this balancing approach has proven to be pretty pusillanimous in protecting the right to vote. Other constitutional rights are protected by stronger approaches such as the “least restrictive alternative” test. Under this approach, even if a law furthers an important government interest, like preventing electioneering at polling places, it will be struck down if doesn’t do so while preserving constitutional rights to the greatest possible extent. Because the Georgia law, even assuming the best possible motivations on the part of Georgia Republicans, is more restrictive than it needs to be in order to prevent electioneering, the courts would strike it down under the least restrictive alternative test. ... "